Bidding Strategies

Maximize Conversion Value

By the AdFlint research team · Last reviewed July 2026

Automated Google strategy that pursues the highest total conversion value within the budget, with an optional target ROAS to constrain efficiency.

It needs genuinely different values passed with your conversions, otherwise every conversion looks identical and it degenerates into Maximize Conversions. Ecommerce accounts and lead-gen accounts with scored leads use it to push toward high-value orders rather than cheap ones. The usual failure is a hard-coded value on the conversion action, which makes the value model meaningless while reports still display a confident ROAS figure.

Key takeaways

  • The strategy only functions with genuinely varied conversion values; a flat value on every conversion collapses it into Maximize Conversions with extra steps.
  • Use conversion value rules to reflect known higher- or lower-value segments without altering your underlying revenue tracking.
  • Periodically reconcile reported conversion value against actual revenue in your order or CRM system to catch tracking and currency errors.
  • A hard-coded conversion value still produces a plausible-looking ROAS number, which is exactly why it goes unnoticed - check the value distribution, not just the ratio.

In practice.

Maximize Conversion Value works the same way mechanically as Maximize Conversions - fully automated CPC bidding based on real-time auction signals - but the objective it solves for is total value across conversions rather than raw count. For that to mean anything, it needs conversion values that actually differ from one conversion to the next: ecommerce accounts typically pass this dynamically as the real order total at purchase, while lead-gen accounts assign it through lead scoring or a value passed via offline conversion import once a lead is qualified or closed.

An optional target ROAS field constrains efficiency the same way a target CPA constrains Maximize Conversions - without it, the strategy spends the full budget chasing the highest total value it can find. Conversion value rules are the other setting worth knowing here: they let you adjust the value Google sees for a conversion based on the user's device, location, or audience membership, without touching the raw revenue number in your own reporting system, so bidding can lean toward segments you know convert at higher value even when the checkout or lead form itself does not capture that distinction.

This strategy earns its complexity in accounts where order size or lead value genuinely varies - an ecommerce store selling a $20 item and a $400 item in the same campaign, or a lead-gen business that scores leads by likely deal size. If every conversion in an account is worth roughly the same amount, Maximize Conversion Value has nothing to differentiate and functions identically to Maximize Conversions while adding setup overhead for no benefit. It is worth checking this before switching to it, since setting it up correctly means wiring dynamic values through the ecommerce tag or a value field on the lead conversion action, and that work is wasted if the resulting values end up clustered near the same number anyway.

The classic failure here is a hard-coded value on the conversion action - every lead or every purchase logged at a flat number regardless of what actually happened. The bidding algorithm has no way to tell a $400 basket from a $20 one if both are recorded identically, so it optimizes for conversion count exactly like Maximize Conversions would, while the account's reports keep displaying a ROAS figure calculated from a number that was never real. Because the math still resolves to a plausible-looking percentage, this mistake tends to go unnoticed for a long time - the report does not look broken, it just is not measuring anything.

Read the Conv. value and Conv. value / cost columns as the primary signals, but check them periodically against actual revenue in your order system or CRM rather than trusting Google Ads in isolation - that is the fastest way to catch a currency mismatch, such as cents passed as dollars, or a stale hard-coded value before it skews months of bidding decisions. It is also worth spot-checking the distribution of individual conversion values in the conversion action's own diagnostics; if every single value is identical, that is the hard-coded-value problem showing up directly in the data.

Worked example

Real values versus a flat number

Suppose your ecommerce store runs Maximize Conversion Value on a $300 daily budget. Over a month you spend $9,000 and generate $27,000 in tracked purchase value - a 3.0x ROAS. You add a target ROAS of 300% to lock in that efficiency, and spend holds near $9,000 while the algorithm keeps chasing the highest-value baskets it can find at that ratio.

Now suppose instead every conversion in your account is hard-coded to a flat $45 value regardless of actual basket size, even though real orders range from $20 to $400. The algorithm cannot tell the $400 basket from the $20 one, so it optimizes for conversion volume exactly like Maximize Conversions would. If it lands 200 conversions on the same $9,000 spend, the report shows 200 times $45, or $9,000 in value against $9,000 spent - a tidy-looking 1.0x ROAS that reflects nothing about the store's real revenue.

Maximize Conversion Value compared with

The settings this gets confused with, and how to tell them apart.

Common questions.

Why is my Target ROAS underperforming even though ROAS looks accurate in reports?

Check whether conversion values are dynamic, meaning the actual order or lead value, or a flat static number. A flat value produces a ROAS figure that is mathematically real but strategically meaningless, since the bidding has no value signal to act on.

Do I need Target ROAS or is Maximize Conversion Value enough on its own?

Maximize Conversion Value alone spends the full budget chasing the highest value it can find at any cost. Add a target ROAS once you know the efficiency ratio the business can sustain, since it constrains cost rather than chasing value regardless of price.

How do conversion value rules affect Maximize Conversion Value?

They let you adjust the value Google sees for a conversion based on things like the user's location, device, or audience membership, without touching the raw revenue in your reporting system, so bidding can prioritize segments you know are worth more.

How long should I expect Target ROAS to take to stabilize after a big value change?

Expect roughly one to two weeks of a fresh learning period any time the value model changes meaningfully, such as adding conversion value rules or fixing a tracking bug, since bidding was calibrated to a different value distribution.

You should not need to know this to advertise.

AdFlint handles the settings for you, inside the Google and Meta accounts you already own.

Try AdFlint free